Starbucks has made an announcement that it will include calorie counts for each beverage on the menu boards at all of its more than 11,000 locations in the U.S., as well as tags for pastries in the bakery cases.
“In a news release about the new feature, Mary Wagner, the senior vice president of global research and development at Starbucks, said: “Menu labeling is yet another step to extend our commitment to wellness, ensuring our customers and partners (employees) have the information they need to make informed decisions and understand all the ways that they can customize their Starbucks beverages to be within their desired calorie range.”
The company already offers nutrition information on its products online and through printed brochures. It started offering sugar-free syrup in its drinks in 1997 and stopped using high-fructose corn syrup in its baked goods in 2009.”
Nutrition experts argue that transparency on the nutritional and caloric content of foods that people consume on the go and in restaurants can help in curbing overeating and lower obesity rates. However, the data supporting this idea are conflicting. Studies do show that people tend to underestimate the amount of calories that they consume, especially while eating out. “Last month, researchers reported in BMJ that diners who frequented fast-food chains like McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s, KFC, Subway and Dunkin’ Donuts, thought they consumed far fewer calories than they actually did; adults and kids underestimated the caloric content of their meals by 175 calories, while adolescents were off by 259 calories.”
Whether caloric information on menus actually changes people’s eating habits are not, still isn’t clear. “In New York City, where larger fast-food chains and outlets like Starbucks have been required to post calorie information since 2008, some studies showed no change in how much people ate, while others showed that only one-sixth of consumers were motivated by the information to order lower-calorie options.”
Some public-health experts argue that the reason for this is that without putting the calories into some kind of context, attaching these tallies to menus simply won’t be effective. “In a recent editorial for the New England Journal of Medicine, two Johns Hopkins obesity experts wrote, “If customers don’t understand what 250 calories means or how those calories fit into their overall daily dietary requirements, posting that information on a menu may not be very useful. That difficulty may apply particularly to minority populations and those with low socioeconomic status, who are at highest risk for obesity and tend to have lower-than-average levels of nutritional literacy and numeracy, which may make it difficult for them to translate the information into interpretable equivalents.”
Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, an associate professor of medicine and epidemiology at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, isn’t exorbitantly hopeful about the effectiveness in adding calorie counts to menus in the hopes of improving health. “He says people may end up substituting unhealthy, albeit lower-calorie options, in at attempt to lower their caloric intake. Mozaffarian and his colleagues published their findings as a formal scientific statement from the American Heart Association.”
He told TIME in May:
“If [the food industry] responds to that by decreasing portion sizes, that would be great, but if they respond by taking out healthy fats, which is one of the easiest ways to reduce calories, that’s not. For consumers, if you made a choice solely based on menu-calorie labels, you may choose soda over nuts calorie-wise, which is a terrible decision.In addressing some of these issues, other nutrition experts hope to see different information on the menus as well, such as how much physical activity it might take to work off a Java Chip Frappuccino so that customers can put what they’re eating and drinking into a realistic context. “A small study testing this idea showed that it could work; those who used menus with physical activity information ordered fewer calories than those who only had caloric content tallies.”
This data will soon become essential information as the U.S Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires that any restaurant chain with over 20 locations in the U.S. must post calorie counts on their menus by 2014. Starbucks and other similar food retailers are hoping to get ahead of progress by posting calorie counts on their products now, but whether or not the new movement will be wholly successful is yet to be seen as the regulation begins to take effect. Will you take a moment longer to consider getting that White Hot Chocolate when it has the whopping number of 640 slapped next to it?